Spain has introduced strict regulations on vaping, with fines of up to €2,000 for vaping on 38 beaches across Barcelona and the very touristic Balearic Islands. These new restrictions are part of a broader initiative aimed at curbing both smoking and vaping, with a growing number of public spaces where their use is prohibited.
The proof is in the pudding
In contrast, countries which have endorsed the use of safer nicotine alternatives such as Sweden and the UK, have a higher use of safer alternatives and significantly low smoking rates. The UK actively promotes vaping as a smoking cessation tool, and studies have shown vapers are twice as likely to quit smoking compared to those using nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs). While Sweden, with widespread snus and vape use, has the lowest smoking rates and tobacco-related diseases in Europe.
Concerns over black market growth and EU influence
Moreover, there is the concern that such bans could drive consumers toward unregulated black-market products and even increase cigarette smoking rates. Sadly, such patterns have been witnessed in countries where bans and harsh restrictions have been set, such as Australia.
Spain’s decision to ban flavoured vapes could also influence EU-wide regulations as lawmakers debate updates to the Tobacco Products Directive. Several EU nations—Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Hungary, Lithuania, the Netherlands, and Slovenia—have already implemented restrictions on vape flavors. If Spain moves forward, it would become the largest EU country to enforce such a ban, strengthening momentum for stricter vaping laws across Europe.
On a positive note, to ensure consumer safety, the government plans to introduce stricter labeling requirements for nicotine-free vapes. These products will be required to list all ingredients, include health warnings, and provide information on contraindications and potential side effects. Additionally, e-cigarettes must be leak-free, unbreakable, and deliver a consistent nicotine dose to comply with the new regulations.
The relative risk of different products should be taken into account
However the restrictions which treat vaping the same as smoking are concerning. They undermine smoking cessation efforts and harm public health by discouraging smokers from switching to a less harmful alternative. Numerous studies, including research from Public Health England (now OHID) and the Royal College of Physicians, have confirmed that vaping is at least 95% less harmful than smoking. Unlike cigarettes, vapes do not produce tar or carbon monoxide, the primary causes of smoking-related illnesses.
By imposing smoking-like restrictions, such as bans in public places, excessive taxation, and flavour bans, governments risk pushing vapers back to smoking or fueling black market sales. Public misconceptions about vaping risks are growing, deterring smokers from switching. Instead, policies should reflect the evidence and encourage harm reduction, ensuring vaping remains a viable alternative to smoking.